Old archive
I am not engaging in vandalism, please desist from reverting my edits. 67.233.220.98 (talk) 21:25, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
I just got this message from your autobot: "Your recent edit to Scoubidou (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:39, 18 March 2008 (UTC)" However I have neither read nor edited the Scoubidou article in all my time on Wikipedia.
- Someone else from the IP may have. Aaron Schulz 19:38, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
I have no idea why your bot would be reverting my edits, but the "diff" that it mentions is incorrect and leads nowhere. It tried to link to "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Weymouth&curid=300201&diff=213809339&oldid=213807509" which is apparently garbage. See my talk page for details. 24.118.123.190 (talk) 05:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC) (banned at least 4 times user leeching wifi)
VoABot RFPP work
I noticed VoABot has been avoiding moving down this entry for about a week. Does it not recognize the "already done" template as meaning the issue is dealt with? Thanks, VegaDark (talk) 16:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Seems unrelated. Should be fixed now. Aaron Schulz 17:13, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, regarding the message to the IP "92.43.64.76", it is a shared IP that serves the whole of the East Midlands in the UK, I think it would be in your best intrest to permantly ban this IP from anonymous editing as EMBC serves many schools within the East Midlands area. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.43.64.76 (talk) 15:15, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
VoABot RFPP work - archiving instead of deleting
Hey there, as per the discussion that took place here, I wonder whether you could reconfigure your bot to move the cleared requests to an archive page instead of deleting them. I noticed several users wondering about their requests as they could not find them on the next day and didn't know that they were purged rather quickly. So it might be a good idea to have an 2-3 day archive on a subpage and let the bot clear everything older from there. What do you think? Regards So#Why review me! 15:56, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
