Welcome!
Hello, Crzycheetah, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Joe 04:10, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Denver Broncos season FLC
I addressed your comment as best I could a while ago but yo've not replied. Buc (talk) 17:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
nom is likly to fail in the next 24 hours if nothing major happens. Buc (talk) 17:06, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Do you have anymore feedback to give on the list before I renominate it? Buc (talk) 17:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
FLC
I have completed the reasoning for your opposition by moving the table to earliest to latest chronological order. Reorion (talk) 18:59, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
I was wondering if you want to co-nominating with me for the article, New Orleans Hornets draft history. If you do, just erase maybe on the article's featured list candidate page. Annoyomous24 02:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
NBA draft histories references
I was wondering how do you get the references that I think are impossible to find? For example, The Chris Webber trade on Orlando Magic draft history. Annoyomous24 23:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Re:"27 Missing Kisses"
Hello Crzycheetah. Done it. Best regards, --KoberTalk 04:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Edward P. Carville.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Edward P. Carville.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ЭLСОВВОLД talk 18:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC) --ЭLСОВВОLД talk 18:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
If you get a chance could you take another look at the list, and perhaps offer a Support or Oppose? Cheers! Gary King (talk) 00:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
- Gary King (talk) 01:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
- Crzycheetah 01:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
- Gary King (talk) 02:24, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
..I responded to your comments, thanks! ;)--SRX 19:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
- I responded again.--SRX 00:14, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
No barnstar...
...just thanks. Keep up the good work with your reviews. I appreciate it and I'm sure the rest of the FL community do too. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:43, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I was wondering if you want to review this featured list candidate. If you do, please just click on the subtitle. K. Annoyomous24 01:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Virginia Tech Hokies Football Seasons FLC
Thanks for the helpful review! It's always nice to get a substantive critique, and I think I've addressed your concerns. Feel free to take another look, and if there are places where you think the article needs another citation for something that isn't covered in the list itself, throw down a fact tag and I'll replace it with a cite when I get a chance. Thanks again for taking the time to review it. If you ever need a reviewer yourself, drop me a note and I'll be happy to help. JKBrooks85 (talk) 03:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Concern
Thanks for your concern. At the moment we have five or six lists a day being nominated. We have a few contributors (you are a major one) who offer excellent criticism on each list. Very few contributors !vote. While I'm keen to avoid promoting lists which aren't ready, the Hokies list (for example) had sufficient support for promotion, in my opinion. If not the case then I'm sure I'll be reminded of it very swiftly. A 20-list backlog is something which we must avoid and because the ten-day minimum stay has been reinforced, backlogs will become inevitable with 5/6 lists being added every day. You and Scorpion have similar opinions in this regard, and I understand that. I'll reconsider my position as FL director. Thanks for your note. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- Secondly, I take my reviews of these lists very seriously and would not wish to promote something I'm not happy with. After all, that's the point of me & Scorpion0422 being directors. Otherwise, it just goes back to the way it was months and months ago when average lists (yes, including some of my own for sure) made it through and we had a giant backlog which stopped people nominating and reviewing (I think there were three or four regular reviewers back then). Ultimately the directors have the responsibility of deciding when promotion is appropriate. You may note that I still thoroughly review virtually every candidate, so I'm not promoting lists for the hell of it. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- You think citation problems are being overlooked? Check out Mark Lanegan discography (the FLC and my archives). And Queens of the Stone Age discography. I think I'm doing more than anyone else in areas I'm not familiar with to check citations. With a magnifying glass. Anyway, point made. I'll do my best to avoid premature promotion, but I will end up failing/archiving lists quickly because FLC should not be a repository for PR wannabes. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- I think one problem we have right now is a large number of non-native English speakers (US contributors exempted of course!) and when they nom several lists of the same nature, it's a real challenge to balance AGF with pragmatism. Anyway, I take your point, I'll look more seriously at the quick-fail and try to be more lenient for those lists a day or two overdue. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:21, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Annoyomous24's FLCs
I was wondering if you want to review my featured list nomination for List of Vancouver Canucks head coaches. Thanks if you do! –.– K. Annoyomous24 23:46, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
I was wondering if you can change NBA All-Star Game MVP Award to NBA All-Star Game Most Valuable Player Award because it is more accurate and people who barely know about the article will know what MVP means. –.– K. Annoyomous24 02:53, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
I think I've done all your comments. Please let me know what I'm doing wrong. -- K. Annoyomous24 07:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Can you please Support this featured list nomination for Minnesota Timberwolves draft history or add more comments as this nomination has been on for over 10 days. -- K. Annoyomous24 01:31, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
-
- Please have another look at List of Toronto Blue Jays managers. I fixed your concerns on Annoyomous24's behalf and explained the issues which you raised. There should be no further reasons to oppose. If you have further questions, you can read my reviews or ask me at my talk page. Thanks. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 02:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Your concerns are addressed for the Minnesota Timberwolves draft history FLC. -- K. Annoyomous24 GO LAKERS! 04:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Recent promotions
Since you've been concerned with my recent judgements at WP:FLC, I've opened a thread at WT:FLC to allow the community to discuss it. I'd like for you to contribute. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Major League Baseball Rookie of the Year Award
Hi Czych. Your comments at the FLC for the above list are still outstanding and I think they're valuable enough to prevent promotion. However, Milks Favorite Cookie has gone AWOL since 23 July after a failed RFA. Do you think you'd be prepared to implement your own suggestions or find someone who would, e.g. maclean? The Rambling Man (talk) 07:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Also, if you could add any concluding comments to 2000 Summer Olympics medal count, that'd be very useful indeed. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Broncos seasons
Do you have anymore feedback to give on the list before I renominate it? Buc (talk) 16:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Blue Jays
Hi Czych. I've attempted to remedy the objections you have against the Blue Jays list. I've linked all seasons and coach names, and when sorting by #, the repeated tenures appear together now which I think seems logical, but if you disagree then I'll happily move it back out - if you make it numeric order then it'll sort identically to term which would imply that the # col should be unsortable. If you could have one last look at it and decide if you're happy to support, that'd be great. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:50, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not going to post this message on the nomination page because I don't think this issue deserves revocation of my support; however, I do want to make sure that you are familiar with this paragraph from WP:LINK:
Do not make too many links. An article may be overlinked if any of the following is true:…
(deletion mine)
A link for any single term is excessively repeated in the same article, as in the example of overlinking that follows: "Excessive" typically means more than once for the same term in an article. The purpose of links is to direct the reader to a new spot at a point where the reader is most likely to take a temporary detour due to a need for more information; this is usually on the first occurrence of the term, although the subsequent linking of an important item distant from its previous occurrence in an article may occasionally be appropriate in a table or in a subsection to which readers may jump directly, either within the article or via a section-link from another article.
KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 12:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
-
- KV5, on a sortable table, for the linking to be guaranteed to be "usually on the first occurrence of the term", all instances should be linked. In worst case scenarios, long, chronological, sortable tables could sort in reverse chronlogical order and your one link (which was at the top) is now no longer visible. That's why sortable tables link, link, link. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Fancy adding some sanity to the ongoing discussion there? I'd appreciate it. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
RE: Sister cities of Yerevan
Hey Crzycheetah, for Paris I found it on Paris' website and for Rostov-on-Don from here. Hope this helped. - Fedayee (talk) 06:32, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- The more the merrier, thanks for the link my friend! - Fedayee (talk) 05:08, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
|
WikiProject Los Angeles Lakers Newsletter
August 3, 2008
By -- K. Annoyomous24
|
|
WikiProject Lakers Newsletter
Issue 6 - August 3, 2008
- In this issue
- Project News - Recent news from the WikiProject including FA and GA articles.
- Team News - Transactions and games won and lost by the Los Angeles Lakers.
- Collaboration - A report on this months' project collaboration, Los Angeles Lakers.
- Featured Picture - A selected image for the newsletter.
|
- Project News
- As of August 3, the project has 14 members, listed here.
- As of August 3, the project has a one good article and two featured lists.
- Good article:
- Featured lists:
- A userbox for the the members of the project is available at User:Basketball110/Lakers. Feel free to add it to your page to show that you are a part of the WikiProject.
- More members are still needed. To invite people, use the template at Template:WP LAKERS Invite. If and once they have joined, don't forget to welcome them using the template at Template:WPLAKERSwelcome.
- If you would like to write the next newsletter, please nominate yourself here.
- Project Collaboration – August 2008
Each newsletter, the editor will select one article that he or she thinks needs a bit of work, or maintaining. This newsletter, K. Annoyomous24 (the editor) chose the article "Kobe Bryant." Don't forget to drop by the page and see what you can do.
- Featured Picture
- 2008 Playoff Bracket
Playoff Bracket Legend
- Teams in italics have home court advantage
- Teams in bold advance to the next round
- Numbers to the left of each team indicate team's position in-season
- Numbers to the right of each team indicate the number of games won
- The division champions possess an asterisk (*)
|
- Team News
- Other team news
- Transactions
The Lakers have been involved in the following transactions during the 2008–09 off-season.
- Draft pick
|
|
Archives • Newsroom
|
-- K. Annoyomous24 GO LAKERS! Please reply on my talk page. Thanks. 00:52, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Philadelphia Phillies managers
Now that the discussion has closed, I will be trying to make fixes to the article in a push for a second nomination. However, I would still appreciate some clarification on one point. As I understand your first unresolved point, you stated that sentences simply cannot start with "Of...". I beg to differ on this issue. The Bedford Handbook, a reputable and well-respected writing style guide, states that "a complex sentence is composed of one independent clause with one or more subordinate clauses." Using "of" to start an initial prepositional phrase, otherwise known as an adverb subordinate clause, is grammatically correct, and an example is given in the book ("If you scatter thorns, don't go barefoot."). It is also written in the same book that "to give unequal emphasis to two or more ideas, [one should] express the major idea in an independent clause and place any minor ideas in subordinate clauses or phrases." I will not presume to make assumptions about your reasoning; however, I would like to understand your point of view on this issue. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 16:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- What I wrote adheres exactly to the rules for subordinate clauses. The word "manager" may seem repetitive, but it was added in response to an earlier review because the numbers were previously next to each other. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 18:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the review! I've addressed all of your concerns except one which I do not understand. Could you elaborate? Malinaccier (talk) 01:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- Ha, thanks! I've been trying to figure it out, and then once I did I edit conflicted with you. Thanks again, Malinaccier (talk) 01:20, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, I've finished the references. Malinaccier (talk) 01:30, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- I believe I've adressed your final concern! Malinaccier (talk) 22:07, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Broncos seasons
Do you have anymore feedback to give on the list before I renominate it? BUC (talk) 11:06, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
I was wondering if you can review this FLC. Thanks! -- K. Annoyomous24 GO LAKERS! Please reply on my talk page. Thanks. 11:16, 10 August 2008 (UTC)}}
 |
I was wondering if you can review this featured list candidate. Thanks. -- K. Annoyomous24 GO LAKERS! Please reply on my talk page. Thanks. 11:54, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
|
-- K. Annoyomous24 GO LAKERS! Please reply on my talk page. Thanks. 09:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Currently, KV5 is asking you a question on this FLC. May you please reply ASAP. Thanks. -- K. Annoyomous24 GO LAKERS! Please reply on my talk page. Thanks. 05:07, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I am wondering if you can review this FLC again. Thanks.—Chris! ct 17:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- I finish your request. So let me know what you think. Thanks.—Chris! ct 01:45, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
FLC
 |
Thank you for recently reviewing an FLC candidate that I nominated. Your work is appreciated! from KV5 |
|
