| State |
Marriage |
|
Same-sex unions |
Notes |
| Defined |
Result |
|
Civil Unions |
Domestic
Partnership |
| Constitution |
Statute |
Licenses |
Recogn. |
|
Def. |
Status |
Def. |
Status |
Alabama |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
No |
None |
|
Alaska |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
Petitions are made to start a ban ballot on civil unions too. |
Arizona |
Rejected |
Yes |
Not legal |
Not legal |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
Constitutional amendment narrowly rejected by voters 51% to 49%. |
Arkansas |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
No |
None |
|
California |
No |
Struck down (°) |
Legal* |
Legal |
|
No |
None
|
No |
Legal |
Main article:
Same-sex marriage in California
Originally granting only hospital visitation rights, the scope of domestic partnerships was gradually expanded over a three-year period. Taking effect on January 1, 2005, A.B. 205 extended to domestic partnerships virtually all the legal rights and responsibilities of marriage in California. Thus, domestic partnership in California has been effectively transformed into a civil union status.
|
Colorado |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
No |
None |
No |
Rejected |
On November 2006 ballot, Colorado banned marriage but rejected a referendum to allow a "civil union"-like domestic partnership, sustained by a constitutional amendment. See also this table |
Connecticut |
No |
Yes |
Not legal
but bill
proposed* |
Not legal |
|
No |
Legal |
? |
? |
Main article:
Same-sex marriage in Connecticut
Does not award marriage licenses to same-sex couples but the civil unions confer "all of the state-level spousal rights and responsibilities."[2]
A proposition occurred beginning 2007 to allow the marriage.
|
Delaware |
No |
Yes |
Not legal |
Not legal |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
|
District of Columbia |
No |
No |
Not legal |
Not legal |
|
No |
None |
No |
Legal* |
Main article: Domestic partnership in District of Columbia
Enacted 1992; implemented 2002; expanded 2006, 2008
U.S. Congress has ultimate authority over D.C. thereby prohibiting same-sex marriages or civil unions despite popular local support.[3]
|
Florida |
No |
Yes |
Not legal |
Not legal |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
Petitions are made to start a ban ballot. |
Georgia |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
No |
None |
|
Hawaii |
Yes |
Yes |
Ban
permitted
Not legal. |
Not legal |
|
No |
None
(proposed) |
No |
Legal* |
Minimal benefits, available to all adults, including relatives; official terminology is reciprocal beneficiary relationship*.[2]
Bill proposed to afford civil unions but killed in Judiciary Committee.
|
Idaho |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
|
Illinois |
No |
Yes |
Not legal |
Not legal |
|
No |
None but proposed |
No |
None |
Petitions are made to start a ban ballot. Marriage or civil union proposition, heading rather to civil unions. |
Indiana |
No |
Yes |
Not legal |
Not legal |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
Legislative initiative to start a ban ballot. |
Iowa |
No |
Yes |
legal
but under
appeal |
Not legal |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
Main article:
Same-sex marriage in Iowa
In August 2007, Polk County judge ruled Iowa's statutory ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional, but ruling was quickly stayed and appealed. Legislative initiative to begin constitutional ban ballot process was unsuccessful in 2008. Those in opposition vow to push the issue in 2009 legislative session.
|
Kansas |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
No |
None |
|
Kentucky |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
No |
None |
|
Louisiana |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
No |
None |
|
Maine |
No |
Yes |
Not legal |
As dom. partners |
|
No |
None |
No |
Legal* |
Main article:
Domestic partnership in Maine
The Maine Domestic Partnership act came into effect on July 30, 2004.[1]
Same-sex couple who married elsewhere may register their marriage as a domestic partnership.
|
Maryland |
No |
Yes |
Not legal* |
Not legal |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
Main article:
Same-sex marriage in Maryland
"The first state law defining marriage as a union between a man and woman was adopted by Maryland in 1973."[1]
|
Massachusetts |
No |
No |
Legal* by
Supreme
Court
decision |
Yes. |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
Main article:
Same-sex marriage in Massachusetts |
Michigan |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
No |
None |
|
Minnesota |
No |
Yes |
Not legal |
Not legal |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
Legislative initiative and petitions are made to start a ban ballot. |
Mississippi |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
|
Missouri |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
|
Montana |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
|
Nebraska |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
Banned |
|
Nevada |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
|
New Hampshire |
No |
Yes |
Not legal |
Not legal |
|
No |
Legal on
1/1/2008 |
No |
None |
State law pre-dates DOMA.[1]
The civil unions bill was signed on May 31, 2007. |
New Jersey |
Proposal
rejected |
No* |
None |
As civil
unions |
|
No |
Legal |
No |
No more
but
present
valid
ones
allowed. |
Main article:
Same-sex marriage in New Jersey
The state of New Jersey has neither allowed nor recognized marriages between couples of the same-sex. However, the New Jersey Supreme Court, in Lewis v. Harris, required the New Jersey Legislature to change state law by April 24, 2007 to afford same-sex couples the same rights as heterosexual couples.[4] A bill now allows civil unions that will supersede domestic partnerships. These are no more applied but may remain for the present ones.
|
New Mexico |
No |
No |
None |
None |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
Does not contain any public policy explicitly banning same-sex marriage nor defining marriage as between a man and a woman (effectively making the state neutral). |
New York |
No |
No |
Not
allowed
by
court* |
None |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
Main article:
Same-sex marriage in New York |
North Carolina |
No |
Yes |
Not legal |
Not legal |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
Legislative initiative to start a ban ballot. |
North Dakota |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
No |
None |
|
Ohio |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
No |
None |
|
Oklahoma |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
No |
None |
|
Oregon |
Yes |
No |
Banned* |
|
No |
Legal on
1/1/2008 |
No |
None |
Main article:
Same-sex marriage in Oregon
Domestic partnership legislation similar to the California model signed on May 9th, 2007.
|
Pennsylvania |
No |
Yes |
Not legal |
Not legal |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
Petitions are made to start a ban ballot. |
Rhode Island |
No |
No |
None |
Yes |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
Does not contain any public policy explicitly banning same-sex marriage nor defining marriage as between a man and a woman (effectively making the state neutral). Does not award marriage licenses, but does extend limited rights to same-sex couples.[2]. Now this is the basis on which RI will recognize the same-sex couples married in Massachusetts according to the Attorney General. |
South Carolina |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
Yes |
None |
|
South Dakota |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
Banned |
|
Tennessee |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
|
Texas |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
No |
None |
|
Utah |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
No |
None |
|
Vermont |
No |
Yes |
Not legal
but
proposed |
Not legal |
|
No |
Legal |
No |
None |
Vermont civil unions provide same-sex couples access to state-level marriage benefits.[1] Parties to a civil union are entitled to all of the state-level spousal rights and responsibilities and only for couples who live in the state of Vermont.[2]
A proposition is made to legalize marriage.
|
Virginia |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
Banned |
|
Washington |
No |
Yes |
Not legal
* |
As dom. partners |
|
No |
None |
No |
Legal on
22/07/2007 |
Main article:
Same-sex marriage in Washington
Same-sex couple who married elsewhere may register their marriage as a domestic partnership.
|
West Virginia |
No |
Yes |
Not legal |
Not legal |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
Petitions are made to start a ban ballot. |
Wisconsin |
Yes |
Yes |
Banned |
|
Banned |
No |
None |
|
Wyoming |
No |
Yes |
Not legal |
Not legal |
|
No |
None |
No |
None |
State law pre-dates DOMA.[1] |