|
44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island
|
| 44 Liquormart Inc. v. Rhode Island |
|
Supreme Court of the United States |
Argued November 1, 1995
Decided May 13, 1996
|
| Full case name: |
44 LIQUORMART, INC., et al. v. RHODE ISLAND et al. |
|
| Holding |
| ... |
| Court membership |
Chief Justice: William Rehnquist
Associate Justices: John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer |
| Case opinions |
Majority by: Stevens
Joined by: Rehnquist, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Concurrence by: O'Connor
Joined by: Rehnquist, Souter, Breyer
Concurrence by: Scalia
Concurrence by: Thomas
|
| Laws applied |
| ... |
44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island, 517 U.S. 484 (1996)[1], was a United States Supreme Court case which held that ...
Background
The decision
References
The Oyez Project, 44 Liquormart v. Rhode Island, 517 U.S. 484 (1996). Last viewed April 23, 2008.
O'Brien, David M. Constitutional Law and Politics. Vol. II: Civil Rights and Civil Liberties 6th ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2005. Pages 564-572.
See also
External links
|
